October 27, 2008

Serfass v. CIT Group

Filed under: RESPA

Here’s a case where the consumer sent a Qualified Written Request to the lender and the lender did not respond correctly.  Specifically, 15 U.S.C. 2605(e)(3) requires:

Protection of credit rating

During the 60-day period beginning on the date of the servicer’s receipt from any borrower of a qualified written request relating to a dispute regarding the borrower’s payments, a servicer may not provide information regarding any overdue payment, owed by such borrower and relating to such period or qualified written request, to any consumer reporting agency (as such term is defined under section 1681a of title 15).

The plaintiff was awarded $1,000 statutory damages and the defendant CIT Group was also ordered to pay $19,500 in attorney fees.  Sounds like an expensive letter to me.

SERFASS v. CIT GROUP/CONSUMER FINANCE, INC. (S.C. 10-16-2008) Civil Action No. 8:07-90-WMC

October 26, 2008

Buying Tradelines

Hello Paul:

I took on the task of cleaning my credit and, when the dust cleared, I don’t have any accounts, tradelines or anything on my file. I know that authorized users are no longer effective. I heard that if you are considering tradelines, they should be joint and if you use them, you must let the creditors when you apply for credit. 

My question, is the process of applying tradelines all illegal. 

Thank you for your time and service.

Umar (more…)

2Pe 3:8-9

Filed under: Bible

But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.  The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

October 24, 2008

How Much Should a Loan Modification Cost?

Filed under: Loan Modification

Paul, my husband and I just paid LoanModCompany $3500 for a loan mod negotiation service.  They claim to use an attorney to handle our negotiations, so I understood the cost, but am now seeing lower fees from competitors. 

The broker that recommended them thought our lender would forgive our $100,000 2nd and reduce our 360,000 1st to a 3% p & i loan. 

Are we paying too much?  Is their projection out of touch with what lenders are really agreeing to? 

My father was saying that the gov is now talking about loan mods and i should wait to see what they will be offering, any thoughts on what might be on the horizon from them compared to what loan mod entities are offering now? 

Thanks! 

Lorraine (more…)

Flagstar Hope For Homeowners Program

Filed under: FHA Loan

The Hope for Homeowners program is a “workout” servicing tool. Flagstar views this program as a last resort only to be considered when borrowers can prove they are in financial distress. We will be using this tool for Flagstar-serviced loans that we determine are in need of workout assistance. We will not be originating loans that are not serviced by Flagstar. There is not a published product description for this program. The final determination as to whether this program is the best option for the borrower will be made at our sole discretion. If you have customers with loans being serviced by Flagstar that have become financially distressed, please instruct them to contact our Loss Mitigation department at (800) 968-7700 to discuss their options. For more information and details of this program, please reference the Hope for Homeowners Page on the HUD Web site. 

Source – NAMB.org

Operation Clean Sweep

Filed under: Credit Repair

The Federal Trade Commission and 24 state agencies today announced a crackdown on 33 operations that deceptively claim they can remove negative information from consumers’ credit reports, even if that information is accurate and timely. In the seven FTC actions announced today the Commission seeks to halt the defendants’ allegedly unlawful business practices, prohibit further violations, and make them pay consumer redress and give up their ill-gotten gains. In addition, the FTC announced three related credit repair cases earlier this year.

‘Companies that promise they are able to scrub your credit reports of accurate, negative information for a fee are lying – plain and simple,’ said Lydia Parnes, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. ‘Under federal law, accurate, negative information can be reported for up to seven years, and some bankruptcies can be reported for up to 10 years.’

In response to thousands of complaints from consumers throughout the nation, the FTC launched ‘Operation Clean Sweep’ with 24 state agencies in 22 states. In the cases announced today, the Commission charged seven operations with violating the FTC Act and the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA) by making false and misleading statements, such as claiming they can substantially improve consumers’ credit reports by removing accurate, negative information from their credit reports. The agency also alleged that the defendants violated the CROA by charging an advance fee for credit repair services. The 26 state actions include alleged violations of state laws and the CROA.

According to complaints filed by the FTC:

Nationwide Credit Services, Inc. and James R. Dooley, based in Florida, advertise their credit repair services on ehappyhour.com and in the Yellow Pages, stating, for example, that bankruptcies, judgments, slow pay history, repossessions, and collection accounts ‘CAN BE LEGALLY ERASED!’ The defendants charge from $300 to $1,000, including an advance fee ranging from $75 to $150, and a monthly fee that they often debit from consumers’ bank accounts. After paying the fees, consumers find that the defendants rarely, if ever, deliver the promised results. In many instances, they take consumers’ money without providing any services. Consumers often find their cancellation requests ignored, and their refund requests are almost always denied.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Clean Credit Report Services, Inc., Ricardo A. Miranda, Daniel R. Miranda, and Ruthy Villabona, based in Florida, advertise on radio, television, and ccrstoday.com, which has testimonials, such as one purportedly from an Atlanta woman, stating, ‘. . . When I lost my job and simply didn’t pay my credit cards and when I needed to get my car loan they said I needed at least a 600 credit score but I had a 480. I got into the CCRS club and did what they told me to do . . . When I pulled my report online I realized that I had a 621. I couldn’t believe this really works.’ Consumers who responded to the defendants’ ads on syndicated radio talk shows were told that the defendants would help remove all the negative remarks that appear on their credit, and that even current debt could be removed.

Once consumers pay $400 in advance for services, the defendants often debit the money from their bank accounts before receiving a signed contract, and then do little, if anything, to fulfill their promises. When consumers reach them to complain, they’re told a variety of excuses, and those who persist are sometimes hung up on, put on hold, or ignored.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division. The FTC thanks the Better Business Bureau of Southeast Florida for its invaluable assistance.

Successful Credit Service Corporation, also doing business as Success Credit Services, and Tracy Ballard, also known as Tracy Ballard-Straughn, based in California, promote their credit repair services primarily through appearances at seminars offering real estate investment or other business opportunities. They also promote themselves via audio podcasts on third-party Web sites and through their Web sites, successcreditservices.com and successfulcreditservices.org. They claim to have special relationships ‘with every creditor, collection company, public records provider and credit bureaus,’ and that because of this, they can perform ‘hard’ or permanent deletions of all kinds of derogatory information from consumer’s credit reports. Consumers typically must pay advance fees ranging from $3,000 to $4,000 per person.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. The FTC thanks the California Attorney General’s office for its invaluable assistance.

Advantage Credit Repair LLC and Mark D. Solomon, based in Illinois, advertise on myadvantagecredit.com and Yellow Pages ads, stating, ‘We would never charge a large fee up front, or make you wait a long period of time to refund your money if we do not get results. You WILL see results in 60 days, or your money will be refunded in full . . .’ The defendants charge $495 per person and $665 for a couple, and they require $219 or $269, respectively, in advance. Refund requests are almost always denied.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

RCA Credit Services, LLC, Rick Lee Crosby, Jr., and Brady Wellington, based in Florida, advertise on RCACredit.com and RCAcreditservices.com. Their ads state, ‘Boost Your Credit Score Into The 700s’ in as little as 30 days’ and claim that RCA can remove ‘ANY or ALL Negative Accounts From Your Credit Report.’ They state that a credit expert will ‘coach you on ways to remove negative remarks and unpaid debts from your credit report while adding new positive reporting accounts to your credit file.’ The defendants charge from $500 to more than $3,000, and they require at least partial payment in advance of providing any services. In many instances, the defendants allegedly provided consumers no services at all.

These defendants are also charged with violating the CROA by failing to provide, before contracts are signed, a written statement of ‘Consumer Credit File Rights Under State and Federal Law;’ failing to include in their consumer contracts conspicuous statements about consumers’ right to cancel without penalty or obligation within three business days; and failing to provide a written ‘Notice of Cancellation’ form.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Latrese & Kevin Enterprises, Inc., also d/b/a Hargrave & Associates Financial Solutions, Latrese Hargrave, also known as Latrese V. Williams, and Kevin Hargrave, Sr., based in Florida, advertise on hargraveandassociates.com and helpmycreditnow.com, and on radio stations with rhythm & blues, hip-hop, and gospel formats. They charge $250 to $270 per person and $450 per couple, half or all of which they require in advance. In a radio script, the defendants state, ‘They specialize in erasing bad credit! Hargrave & Associates covers all three major credit bureaus, slow pays, charge-offs, repossessions can be erased for two-hundred, fifty dollars.’

Also, on hargravecard.com and in radio ads, the defendants offer an advance-fee credit card, for $100 to $300, claiming that applicants will be approved for a guaranteed credit limit ranging from $500 to $10,000. These defendants are also charged with violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule by requesting or receiving a fee in advance of consumers obtaining a credit card when the defendants have guaranteed or represented a high likelihood of success in obtaining or arranging for the acquisition of a credit card. In addition, they are charged with violating the FTC Act by falsely representing that consumers will receive a credit card after paying a fee.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

ACE Group, Inc., also d/b/a as American Credit Experts, Inc., The Ace Group, Inc., The Ace Group, and ACE; Legal Credit Repair Center, Inc., also d/b/a LCRC, Michael Singer, Melvin Kessler, and Gerald Roth, based in Florida, advertise on aceintake.com, foryourcredit.com, helpformycredit.com, helpmycredit.com, and pop-up Internet ads. One ad states, ‘ . . . ACE has developed a methodology which starts to show results in as little as 60 days.’ In telephone calls responding to the ads, FTC investigators posing as consumers were told, ‘. . . everything surrounding your bankruptcy will be removed from your credit report . . .’ and late payments ‘are easy to remove.’

The defendants typically charge $39.95 to $59.95 initially, then $59.95 per month for their promised services, which they indicate may take up to six to eight months. They send the major credit reporting agencies repeated dispute letters on consumers’ behalf, with vague statements about each disputed debt or bankruptcy record, but with no further explanation or documentation. The defendants dispute items repeatedly, even after the credit bureaus have verified them.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 4-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Operation Clean Sweep also includes three FTC cases announced earlier this year: Home Buyers Consulting Network, Inc., Payneless Credit Repair, LLC, and Lee Harrison Credit Restoration (see press releases dated May 22, July 17, and September 10).

State law enforcement efforts involved the attorney general offices in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, and West Virginia; the justice departments of North Carolina, Oregon, and Wisconsin; Idaho’s Department of Finance; Louisiana’s Office of Financial Institutions; Vermont’s Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities & Health Care Administration; and Wisconsin’s Department of Financial Institutions.

The FTC appreciates the participation of every state agency involved in this effort.

Advice for Consumers

How can you avoid turning credit repair into credit despair? Here are a few suggestions:

  • Avoid any company that wants you to pay for credit repair services before they provide any services. It is against the law.
  • Avoid any credit repair company that will not tell you your legal rights and what you can do, yourself, for free.
  • Avoid any credit repair company that tells you not to contact a credit reporting company directly.
  • Avoid any credit repair company that advises you to dispute all of the information in your credit report.
  • Avoid any company that suggests creating a ‘new’ credit identity – and then, a new credit report – by applying for an Employer Identification Number to use instead of your Social Security number. That is against the law. If you follow illegal advice and commit fraud, you also may be subject to prosecution.

Source – FTC.gov

October 23, 2008

HOEPADELE

Filed under: TILA

I have seen your site and I know that you mostly deal with debtors and consumers.

I am a “lender”–that is, I pooled my money with my husband and another couple to a hard money loan company and our money was loaned to someone at a high interest rate for a second mortgage.

Now, the property owner is stating that the loan is illegal and wants to rescind. They indicated that the loan has many violations and that we (meaning my husband and I) are liable for this even though we are not brokers. Could this be true?

We’re not sure if we can trust the servicer since they are also implicated and we could possibly have a cause of action against them as they should have shielded us or at least checked everything before we lent them money. Do we have any legal recourse with the servicer who solicited us?

I understand that you are a consumer site, but I was wondering what your opinion might be on the matter.

Adele

What’s The Rescore

Filed under: Rapid Rescore

Hi Paul,

My husband and I are in the process of buying a home and we were working with a mortgage broker who said he could raise the credit score to the mid 600s so we can qualify for a FHA loan and get a good rate. However, since he’s claimed to be working on increasing the credit score, it has gone down 10 points. I ordered a copy of my report and saw that he pulled the credit 3 different times and that there are several inquires that I didn’t authorize. I think this reduced my score. What can I do about this?

I also paid on a judgement and lien years ago but it is not reflecting on the report. I filed a dispute with the CRA.

From reading your site I became aware of rapid rescoring. Should I ask my mortgage broker to do a rapid rescoring to improve my score so we can get the loan? What do you suggest?

Mary (more…)

October 22, 2008

Commercially Reasonable Sale

Filed under: Repo

Recently I returned a 2002 vehicle to J.D.Byrider,CNAC, I was up to date on payments, yet a constant struggle / insurance etc. Now they send me a letter os auction sale,and will garnish my wages for any difference in payoff. I thought I was doing the honorable thig. Took excelent care of the car, Even left it with a full tank of gas.

Diane (more…)

Townes v. TransUnion Settlement

Filed under: Credit Reports

I feel like I am the only one in the dark here but you always answer everyone as honestly and fairly as possible everytime I have ever read any subject on here.I want to say you have a great approach to this and are helping so many more people than you realize.PLEASE NEVER STOP!:)

My question is:I signed up for the Townes vs. Transunion settlement and have yet to figure out where or how to access the free 6 months of my credit report that they were supposed to let us have as part of the settlement.I made the deadline months ago.

Can you help me?

Diane (more…)

« Previous PageNext Page »

Back to Broken Credit Blog